Premium
Developmental Changes in Resistance to Herbivory: Implications for Individuals and Populations
Author(s) -
Kearsley Michael J. C.,
Whitham Thomas G.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.2307/1937547
Subject(s) - biology , herbivore , juvenile , resistance (ecology) , competition (biology) , aphid , ecology , gall , insect , survivorship curve , host (biology) , botany , zoology , cancer , genetics
The hypothesis that individual plants undergo predictable changes in their resistance to herbivory as they mature was experimentally tested. The performance of two species of insects transferred onto different—aged trees of the same naturally occurring clones of narrowleaf cottonwood, Populus angustifolia, showed opposing and significant changes in host resistance as a function of tree age. The gall—forming aphid Pemphigus betae was 70 times as common on mature trees as on juvenile trees. Transfer experiments demonstrated that this pattern is adaptive; survivorship on mature trees was 50% higher than on juvenile trees. The leaf—feeding beetle Chrysomela confluens exhibited opposite distribution on hosts, with densities 400 times as high on juvenile as on mature trees. This is also adaptive; larvae transferred to mature hosts had 50% lower survival and took 25% longer to reach adulthood than those transferred to juvenile trees. These survivorship and performance data and our inability to support the hypotheses of other mechanisms that would produce the observed distributions suggest that the distributions result from the insects' preferences for different—aged hosts. Several basic implications emerge. (1) Developmental changes in resistance and susceptibility of hosts are important components in determining the distribution of herbivores. (2) A single plant can change rapidly in its resistance traits with age such that a 10—fold change in resistance can occur over a 2—yr period. (3) As trees mature, increased and decreased resistances to different herbivores can produce nonoverlapping herbivore distributions that could be misinterpreted as being the result of competition (e.g., in this study, beetle abundance was strongly, negatively correlated with aphid abundance). (4) While host maturation processes have large effects on within— and between—tree variation in resistance to herbivores, the implications for herbivore population dynamics and community structuring have not been generally appreciated.