z-logo
Premium
Defenses of Males Against Cannibalism in the Rotifer Asplanchna: Size, Shape, and Failure to Elicit Tactile Feeding Responese
Author(s) -
Gilbert John J.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.2307/1936933
Subject(s) - biology , clone (java method) , rotifer , brachionus calyciflorus , zoology , ciliate , cannibalism , intraspecific competition , ecology , larva , genetics , gene
In Asplanchna, ♂ ♂ are considerably smaller than the ♀ ♀. In A. sieboldi this sexual dimorphism may be further accentuated because the ♀ ♀ are trimorphic in size and shape. The intermediate—sized, cruciform, and especially the largest, campanulate morphs are cannibalistic. However, the ♂ ♂ are protected from these cannibalistic ♀ ♀ by 2 different types of mechanisms. They can fail to elicit contact feeding responses and they can have body sizes and body wall outgrowths sufficiently large to prevent attacking ♀ ♀ from capturing them. The degree to which each of these mechanisms is developed can vary greatly between clones or taxa, may be inversely related, and may be a function of the voracity and size of cannibalistic ♀ ♀ to which the ♂ ♂ are generally exposed. Campanulate ♀ ♀ from clone 12C1, readily attacked both ♀ ♀ from the smallest, saccate morph of their own clone and also ♀ ♀ from clone 10C6, but they rarely attacked ♂ ♂ of their own clone. Campanulate ♀ ♀ from clone 10C6 regularly attacked ♂ clonemates, but cruciform ♀ ♀ from this clone responded more frequently to ♂ ♂ from clone 12C1 than to ♂ ♂ from their own clone. On a given diet, ♂ ♂ from clone 10C6 were about 1.5 x larger and had more pronounced body wall outgrowths than those from clone 12C1. In both clones, the sizes of ♂ ♂ and mictic (♂—producing) ♀ ♀ were influenced by the diet, being larger in populations fed on the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus than those fed on the ciliate Paramecium aurelia. It may be adaptive for ♂ ♂ to be as small and simply constructed as possible; they have only a rudimentary digestive system, and so energy for their production must come entirely from their mictic—♀ parents. Therefore, ♂ size and body wall outgrowth development may represent a balance between production costs and ability to withstand cannibalism. Evolution of a mechanism preventing attack by cannibalistic ♀ ♀ may decrease the requirements for defensive structures and increase the efficiency of ♂ production and hence subsequent resting egg production.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom