Population Density and the Economics of Territorial Defense in a Coral Reef Fish

We propose that in some species, local population density can strongly affect the economic defendability of a mating territory. This is so because the numbers of females and potentially interfering males determine allocations of time and energy to reproduction and defense. At low densities, allocations to defense should be small and territorial mating success should initially rise with local density, reflecting the supply of females. If defense takes priority over mating, higher population densities can create a situation in which the time or energy devoted to defense against other males detracts from allocations to reproduction. Thus a point is reached where territorial mating success declines with increasing density, as a function of the number of nonterritorial males. We investigated these hypotheses by recording changes in the daily mating success of territorial males of the bluehead wrasse (Thalassoma bifasciatum) following experimental manipulations of local population size and composition. On large reefs, where mating population densities are already high, territorial mating success varied inversely with changes in overall population density and with changes in nonterritorial male numbers only; changes in female numbers had little effect. Thus at higher densities the demands of defense appear to be more important in determining mating success than the supply of available mates. Territorial mating success varied directly with population density changes only on the smallest experimental reff, where there were few nonterritorial males. The reduction of mating success at higher densities was correlated with a decreases in both the time spent in courtship and the efficiency of courtship itself. The effect of population density should be particularly important in species with short breeding periods and where the male contributes relatively little time or energy to each mating.