z-logo
Premium
A Comparison of Fiscal Consequences for Tax and Expenditure Limitation Proposals
Author(s) -
Edelman Mark A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
applied economic perspectives and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.4
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 2040-5804
pISSN - 2040-5790
DOI - 10.2307/1349979
Subject(s) - revenue , property tax , state (computer science) , economics , local government , government (linguistics) , public economics , government revenue , direct tax , government expenditure , tax revenue , indirect tax , public finance , value added tax , business , finance , tax reform , macroeconomics , public administration , political science , linguistics , philosophy , algorithm , computer science
Abstract Three constitutional tax and expenditure limitation proposals are analyzed for historical consequences. The first and second allowed 32% less state spending and $710 million less in local government aid compared to actual. The first proposal also imposed limits on local government units and allowed property taxes to increase about 5% more than actual. The second proposal covered state revenues only and would have required a 29.7% increase in property taxes to fully replace the reduction in local government aid. A third proposal excluded local government aid but effectively covered only half of the state general fund revenues.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here