z-logo
Premium
Measuring the Extent of Coalition Formation in Group Decision Making
Author(s) -
Ruppel Fred J.,
Kennedy P. Lynn
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
american journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.949
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1467-8276
pISSN - 0002-9092
DOI - 10.2307/1244285
Subject(s) - voting , group decision making , asset (computer security) , context (archaeology) , group (periodic table) , set (abstract data type) , mathematical economics , relevance (law) , microeconomics , economics , majority rule , process (computing) , distribution (mathematics) , computer science , political science , psychology , social psychology , artificial intelligence , mathematics , law , computer security , mathematical analysis , chemistry , organic chemistry , politics , programming language , operating system , paleontology , biology
Many group decisions begin with small coalitions that recruit additional members until they satisfy a voting rule. This paper introduces a technique for measuring coalition formation in group decision making. The setting involves N players bargaining over the share distribution of an asset. The N ‐person game is analyzed as a set of triads, numerically equal to { N !/( N — 3)!}/3!. A three‐person game is presented to establish the context and to offer insights into the bargaining process. A four‐person game is also presented. The technique finds immediate application in controlled laboratory experiments but has further relevance for numerous real‐world contexts.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here