z-logo
Premium
RAPD markers for genetic differentiation of species within Polytrichum ( Pofytrichaceae, Musci ): a preliminary survey
Author(s) -
Zouhair Rachid,
Corredini Pierre,
Defontaine Alain,
Hallet JeanNoël
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
taxon
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.819
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1996-8175
pISSN - 0040-0262
DOI - 10.2307/1223836
Subject(s) - rapd , biology , taxon , botany , phylogenetic tree , genetic diversity , genetics , population , demography , sociology , gene
Summary Zouhair, R., Corradini, P., Defontaine A. & Hallet, J. N.: RAPD markers for genetic differentiation of species within Polytrichum ( Polytrichaceae, Musci ): a preliminary survey – Taxon 49: 217–229. 2000. – ISSN 0040‐0262. A combination of morphological data and RAPD markers were analysed using thirty colonies from Brittany (France) in six taxa of Polytrichum: P. commune, P. c. var. perigoniale, P. formosum, P. juniperinum, P. piliferum, and P. strictum. Ten primers selected for the RAPD study produced 166 polymorphic markers useful for cluster analysis. The Jaccard index of similarity was high within and among taxa and varied from 0.56 between P. commune and P. formosum to 0.89 between P. formosum and P. juniperinum. For the morphological study, shape of terminal cells of the green lamellae covering the upper surface of leaves allowed differentiation of taxa. In P. commune var. perigoniale these cells were narrower and less deeply notched than in P. commune. The diameter of leaves was scored for many individuals of the six taxa and revealed a sexual dimorphism for size. Female plants have a significantly larger leaf rosette diameter than male plants. Morphological results are largely consistent with RAPD data. However, the high level of genetic differences of P. c. var. perigoniale and P. strictum with other taxa demonstrates the potential of molecular and genetic data in phylogenetic analysis among closely related taxa. The cluster analysis divides the taxa into two groups: (1) P. commune, P. formosum and P. c. var. perigoniale; and (2) P. juniperinum, P. piliferum, and P. strictum. The results do not support splitting the genus into Polytrichum and Polytrichastrum nor the possibility of hybrid origin of P. c. var. perigoniale between P. commune and P. formosum.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here