Premium
THE QUESTION OF ECHINOFOSSULOCACTUS (CACTACEAE)
Author(s) -
Heath P. V.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
taxon
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.819
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1996-8175
pISSN - 0040-0262
DOI - 10.2307/1220860
Subject(s) - citation , library science , information retrieval , computer science , world wide web
comment "although equated with C. smithii by Britton & Rose, is not thought to be the same hybrid". But Otto and Dietrich had said that their Cereus mallisonii "ist dies wahrscheinlich dieselbe Pflanze, welche auch unter der Benennung Cereus smithianus in den englischen Garten vorkommt". Therefore, I took up Sweet's epithet and published xAporoheliocereus smithianus (Heath, 1983). Nevertheless, the rejection of Art. 32 Prop. E and approval of Ex. 1 in Art. 32 Prop. D indicates that this combination is invalid, and a further new combination is required, which is presented below: