z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Skepticism about reasons fundamentalism
Author(s) -
Aleksandar Dobrijević
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
theoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2406-081X
pISSN - 0351-2274
DOI - 10.2298/theo1902153d
Subject(s) - normative , skepticism , fundamentalism , epistemology , foundation (evidence) , philosophy , sociology , political science , law , politics
?Reasons fundamentalists? argue that the normativity of the reasons cannot be explained in terms of other normative concepts, and this claim is most closely related to the dogma that the reasons are the only fundamental elements of the normative domain. ?Ought fundamentalists? claim, however, that it is possible to show that the concept of ?ought? is the only foundation of normativity. There is doubt as to the exclusivity of both of these views.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here