
The laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia in female children in the Republic of North Macedonia
Author(s) -
Toni Risteski
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2406-0895
pISSN - 0370-8179
DOI - 10.2298/sarh201121027r
Subject(s) - medicine , cosmesis , inguinal hernia , groin , hernia , surgery , general surgery , prospective cohort study , laparoscopy
/Objective. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children is a minimally invasive method, and with its safety, feasibility, and excellent cosmesis is an acceptable alternative to open repair. Methods. This is a prospective clinical study, with national data of 49 female children aged 1?14 years, treated via laparoscopic approach. Operative time, time to verticalization (normal position in bed, standing/ walking), hospital stay, nausea, pain, and cosmetic effects (size and visibility of the mark) were elaborated. Results. The results revealed that five (10.2%) children had a family history of inguinal hernia. A total of 29 (59.2%) children had hernia located on the right side, 19 (38.8%) on the left side, and one (2%) on both sides. The average diameter of the inguinal opening was 3 ? 2.17 cm. Sixteen children (32.7%) had hidden hernia. The average operation time of the unilateral intervention was 29.5 ? 6.8 minutes, and for bilateral hernias it was 43.6 ? 7.2 minutes. The average length of hospitalization was 14.1 ? 3.1 hours, and the time needed for a full return to a normal position in bed was 2.6 ? 0.6 hours. The average length of the scar in both the right and the left groin region was 2.2 ? 0.4 mm. A total of 46 (93.9%) parents/guardians were satisfied by the esthetic result, while three (6.1%) had no particular opinion regarding this question. Conclusion. The introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of inguinal hernia is a promising method, which plays an important role as an alternative surgical technique because of the minimal invasiveness of the technique and improved recovery of the children.