
Geant4-based comprehensive study of the absorbed fraction for electrons and gamma-photons using various geometrical models and biological tissues
Author(s) -
Ziaur Rahman,
Saad Rehman,
Sikander M. Mirza,
Waheed Arshed,
Nasir M. Mirza
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
nuclear technology and radiation protection
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.31
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1452-8185
pISSN - 1451-3994
DOI - 10.2298/ntrp1304341r
Subject(s) - absorbed dose , electron , photon , physics , radiation , range (aeronautics) , gamma ray , secondary electrons , atomic physics , irradiation , fraction (chemistry) , nuclear physics , computational physics , materials science , optics , chemistry , composite material , organic chemistry
The Geant4-based comprehensive model has been developed to predict absorbed fraction values for both electrons and gamma photons in spherical, ellipsoidal, and cylindrical geometries. Simulations have been carried out for water, ICRP soft-, brain-, lung-, and ICRU bone tissue for electrons in 0.1 MeV-4 MeV and g-photons in the 0.02 MeV-2.75 MeV energy range. Consistent with experimental observations, the Geant4-simulated values of absorbed fractions show a decreasing trend with an increase in radiation energy. Compared with NIST XCOM and ICRU data, the Geant4-based simulated values of the absorbed fraction remain within a 4.2% and 1.6% deviation, respectively. For electrons and g-photons, the relative difference between the Geant4-based comprehensive model predictions and those of Stabin and Konijnenberg's re-evaluation remains within a 6.8% and 7.4% range, respectively. Ellipsoidal and cylindrical models show 4.9% and 10.1% higher respective values of absorbed dose fractions relative to the spherical model. Target volume dependence of the absorbed fraction values has been found to follow a logical behavior for electrons and Belehradek's equation for g-photons. Gamma-ray absorbed fraction values have been found to be sensitive to the material composition of targets, especially at low energies, while for elections, they remain insensitive to them