z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Critical international relations theory at the beginning of the 21st century
Author(s) -
Dragana Dabić
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
međunarodni problemi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2406-0690
pISSN - 0025-8555
DOI - 10.2298/medjp1703332d
Subject(s) - international relations , international relations theory , normative , vision , epistemology , post realism , politics , critical theory , phenomenon , power (physics) , sociology , field (mathematics) , order (exchange) , positive economics , law and economics , political science , law , economics , philosophy , finance , quantum mechanics , anthropology , pure mathematics , physics , mathematics
The article deals with contemporary tendencies and research in the field of critical theory of international relations. Focusing on the analysis of global power relations, this specific approach within the framework of the science of international relations, draws attention to the different capacities of international actors to influence their own political and economic circumstances. Its contribution to the science of international relations is reflected in the opening (and politicization) of issues that the representatives of traditional theories take as a given fact, or for various reasons do not pay needed attention. The article will present the evolution of the critical theory of international relations, ranging from the radically critical point of view of its founder Robert Cox to the strictly normative orientation of Jurgen Habermas. Contrary to the question of the ?inevitability? of the existing world order (on which the realists insist in particular), as well as the acceptability of dominant patterns and practice of demonstration of power in world politics, it offers alternative visions of the architecture of global relations. It is concluded that the critical theory of international relations, despite numerous criticisms, is relevant, because it approaches the phenomenon of power in a diametrically opposite way, in comparison to the traditional schools of thought in international relations. It provides researchers with analytical tools, so that they can identify the role and significance of both ideas (theory) and practices (political actions) in creating and maintaining the structures of the world order.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here