z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Rousseau and Marx: Convergence or divergence?
Author(s) -
Alpár Lošonc
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
filozofija i društvo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2334-8577
pISSN - 0353-5738
DOI - 10.2298/fid1203176l
Subject(s) - opposition (politics) , divergence (linguistics) , convergence (economics) , reflexivity , politics , sociology , epistemology , neoclassical economics , philosophy , economics , social science , political science , law , linguistics , economic growth
Rousseau and Marx represent two paradigmatic variants of a radical opposition to the world. Without a doubt, there are significant moments of convergence between these thinkers, for instance in terms of division of labour, or in respect to the self-commandment. However, it is our contention that despite certain currents in literature, the tendencies of divergence are stronger than convergence, therefore, we argue that these thinkers signify two different variants of radical thought. We base these differences in a reading of Rousseau that focuses on collective authenticity, justice, self-presentation of people and protest against envy. Marx cannot be read from the perspective of the intensified crisis of non-authenticity, in fact, his critique of political economy generates a reflexive field (overcoming of the wage labour, etc.), which is deeply divergent compared to Rousseau

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here