Open AccessLabor conditions of university teachers on Belgrade University: The problem of evaluation
Author(s) -
Ana Jankovic,
Isidora Jarić
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
filozofija i društvo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2334-8577
pISSN - 0353-5738
DOI - 10.2298/fid0903003j
Subject(s) - standardization , ambiguity , construct (python library) , process (computing) , narrative , resistance (ecology) , work (physics) , mathematics education , chart , sociology , higher education , identification (biology) , order (exchange) , pedagogy , psychology , computer science , political science , business , engineering , law , linguistics , mathematics , finance , mechanical engineering , ecology , philosophy , statistics , botany , biology , operating system , programming language
Current process of the reform of higher education system in Serbia emphasize the issue of standardization of different aspects of teachers' work. Bologna reform introduces certain innovations in the process of evaluation of teachers work - obligatory self-evaluation and student evaluations. First reactions on these innovations stressing the question of ambiguity in interpretations of the results of this kind of evaluations. The empirical analysis of the collected interviews on five faculties of Belgrade University chart some of the symbolic points of resistance, as well as the points of symbolic identification and acceptance related to the process of evaluation. Careful analysis of the ways in which interviewees construct their narratives about the idea of evaluation of their own teaching skills and practices shows numerous defects of current evaluation procedures, as well as the concrete possibilities for their improvements and adjustments to the changed requirements of teaching process in higher education institutions