
Romanian-Serbian relations and the Banat question during the First World War
Author(s) -
Traian Sandu
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
balcanica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2406-0801
pISSN - 0350-7653
DOI - 10.2298/balc0637241s
Subject(s) - serbian , romanian , destiny (iss module) , power (physics) , position (finance) , government (linguistics) , political science , politics , balance (ability) , front (military) , law , economic history , political economy , history , sociology , geography , engineering , economics , medicine , philosophy , linguistics , physics , finance , quantum mechanics , meteorology , physical medicine and rehabilitation , aerospace engineering
Relations between Serbia and Romania throughout the war are viewed from the standpoint of the two countries' rivaling claims on the Banat and within the framework of power balance in the Allied camp with an emphasis on the position of the Romanian government and statesmen. Obviously, Romania's position was more favourable during the first two war years as the Allies sought to win her over for the Entente. Thus the Banat was included in compensations for her entering the war on the side of the Allies. Romania's defeat, however, produced a complete shift in the balance of power, with Romania now in an unenviable position, especially following the breach of the Salonica Front in September 1918. From the Romanian perspective, the Banat's destiny also depended on divergent political positions on the domestic scene. The fate of the Banat was eventually decided by the advancing Serbian army which took the whole territory, though under French command. The final decision became a responsibility of the Paris Peace Conference