Open AccessSovereignty vs Globalization: Indispensable Discourse due to Relationship
Author(s) -
Harry Cephas Charsmar
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of political theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2371-3321
DOI - 10.22609/1.4.1.6
Subject(s) - globalization , sovereignty , argument (complex analysis) , political science , sovereign state , state (computer science) , political economy , economic system , sociology , law , economics , politics , medicine , algorithm , computer science
Over the decades, scholarly discourses on sovereignty and globalization have been produced following various theories and numerous debates about the strength and weakness of the sovereign nation-state and globalization. In this paper, the various theories on the discourse of sovereignty and globalization are traced and placed into four categories as: contending paradigm, globalization paradigm, transformation paradigm and complementary paradigm. Both concepts, sovereignty and globalization, are explored by adopting the methodological framework, sources of explanation. The argument is that there is an intricate relationship between these concepts. To determine the relationship between sovereignty and globalization, three world systems were examined and it revealed that, globalization is born of the sovereign nation-state and that globalization can only be assert in the current sovereign world system and not the ones preceding it. The overall conclusion is that globalization emerged as a result of sovereignty and since the discourse of sovereignty and globalization is about the same space and its inhabitants, they are bound to be discursively set against each other if the discourse focusses solely on the phenomena seen as globalization. The forces of globalization and sovereignty need to be further researched into to be able to tell where they are leading us.