z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Can We Explain Cost Growth in Major Defense Acquisition Programs?
Author(s) -
David L. McNicol
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
defense acquisition research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2156-8405
pISSN - 2156-8391
DOI - 10.22594/dau.21-867.29.01
Subject(s) - range (aeronautics) , root (linguistics) , intellectual property , property (philosophy) , economics , computer science , engineering , epistemology , linguistics , philosophy , aerospace engineering , operating system
This question asked in this article is whether the shared intellectual property of the acquisition community includes an adequate theory of cost growth in major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs). This question is given concrete form by cost growth data for 123 MDAPs. These data are grouped into categories, which range from very small—negative, in fact—cost growth to cost growth in excess of 100%. Potential explanations for this broad range of cost growth considered are: the conventional wisdom about cost growth; a recent RAND study that closely examined cases at both ends of the distribution, along with some possible extensions of that study; and a recent model of the root causes of cost growth. The author argues that each of these falls short; in particular, it seems that the defense acquisition community at large does not have a good explanation of cost growth in the broad range of 30% to 100%.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here