z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Hukuman dalam Pendidikan : Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Abdullah Nasih ‘Ulwan dan B.F. Skinner
Author(s) -
Ahmad Zuhri
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
at-tarbawi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2527-8231
pISSN - 2527-8177
DOI - 10.22515/attarbawi.v2i1.735
Subject(s) - punishment (psychology) , prudence , psychology , phenomenon , islam , islamic education , social psychology , order (exchange) , habit , criminology , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , theology , finance , economics
This study is based on the phenomenon of the cases number of punishment  abuse in education. Punishment has become a favorite treatment chosen by teachers to control students, though not all educators choose it becomes habit. A discussion of punishment in order to educate the students, actually has been discussed several prominent Muslims and the West Islamic education  Abdullah Nashih 'Ulwan, and  the leaders of Western education for example B.F. Skinner. The education of the two figures, the authors tried to find out his thoughts about punishment in education. Furthermore, the authors compare these thoughts to determine the location of the similarities and differences, as well as the benefits and drawbacks. The results of this research are: 1) The idea of punishment in education according to Abd. Nasih 'Ulwan more emphasis on the moral requirements, while Skinner put more emphasis on human behavior; 2) Abd. Nashih 'Ulwan and Skinner do not agree with the punishment. The difference lies in the application of punishment in education. If Abd. Nashih 'Ulwan apply affectionate and gentle, while Skinner apply the principle of prudence. Keywords: Punishment in education, Abdullah Nashih 'Ulwan, B.F. Skinner

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here