z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Vladimir Gippius on Mandelstam, Akhmatova and Literary Generations
Author(s) -
Yulia A. Rykunina
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
literaturnyj fakt
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2542-2421
pISSN - 2541-8297
DOI - 10.22455/2541-8297-2020-18-326-340
Subject(s) - memoir , ideology , portrait , cites , sociocultural evolution , literature , art , art history , philosophy , politics , sociology , law , political science , anthropology , fishery , biology
The paper presents a fragment from Vladimir Gippius’s manuscript of the early 1930s, in which he evaluates his junior literary contemporaries: Osip Mandelstam, Anna Akhmatova, Vladimir Mayakovsky. This evaluation corresponds with the opinion Gippius expressed in the 1910s: Acmeists for him are indifferent esthetes that lack strong qualities of their predecessors. Gippius evaluates negatively his literary portrait by Mandelstam, his pupil in the Tenishev School, in the autobiographic book “Shum vremeni” (“The Noise of the Time”, 1925). This fragment presents Gippius’s reaction on the correspondent chapter of Mandelstam’s book. The author cites memoirs about Gippius and his responses to works of his contemporaries, touches the issue of his literary behavior and concludes, that the reasons for Gippius's rejection of Mandelstam's memoirs were ethic, esthetic, ideological and sociocultural.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here