z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
INCONSISTENCIES IN DETECTING RDRP GENE BY RDRP CONFIRMATORY ASSAY LEADING TO FALSE NEGATIVE COVID-19 RESULTS: A CASE REPORT FROM A DISTRICT REFERRAL HOSPITAL
Author(s) -
Yong Jo Yen,
M Sinniah,
Joash Tan-Loh,
Nor Akmal Mokhtar,
Brian Cheong Mun Keong
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of health and translational medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.145
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 2289-392X
pISSN - 1823-7339
DOI - 10.22452/jummec.sp2020no1.2
Subject(s) - virology , serology , gene , polymerase chain reaction , pneumonia , medicine , covid-19 , biology , immunology , disease , antibody , genetics , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) should be interpreted with clinical, epidemiological history and exposure risk to avoid misdiagnosis. We report a cruise-ship worker with significant travelling history, presented with acute respiratory symptoms and radiographic evidence of viral pneumonia. Initial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene confirmatory assay was negative. Use of a more robust RT-PCR assay detected ORF1ab, N and S genes for COVID-19, and the diagnosis was supported by an IgM and IgG positive COVID-19 serology. Subsequent follow up samples which reported inconsistencies in detecting RdRp gene also raise the concern of reliability of RdRp gene as the confirmatory assay for diagnosis of COVID-19. Patient later had prolonged viral shedding beyond serological recovery, with a negative viral culture reflecting non-infectivity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom