z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Validation of Electronic Health Record Detection of Patient Safety Outcomes
Author(s) -
Christopher Humphreys,
Sarah A. Fletcher,
Nishan Sharma,
Rahim Kachra,
Shan M. Ruzycki
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
canadian journal of general internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2369-1778
pISSN - 1911-1606
DOI - 10.22374/cjgim.v14i3.321
Subject(s) - medicine , clostridium difficile , patient safety , electronic health record , emergency medicine , medical record , intensive care medicine , electronic medical record , medical emergency , health care , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , biology , economic growth , antibiotics
Background: Adverse events (AE) are common for hospitalized Canadians, and lead to worse patient outcomes. Monitoring patient safety is logistically challenging. We aimed to validate the use of our electronic health record (EHR) to monitor important patient safety. Methods: EHR data was used to identify patients who were exposed to one of four high-priority safety outcomes: venous thromboembolism, dysglycemia, Clostridium difficile(C. difficile) infection, and prolonged nil per os(NPO) orders. A manual chart review was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EHR for each patient safety outcome. Results: The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 38.4% to 78.1% and 88.1 to 99.2%, respectively, for the prespecified patient safety outcomes. Conclusion: The EHR is reasonably sensitive and specific to monitor rates of dysglycemia, C. difficileinfection, and prolonged NPO in medical inpatients, but does not have adequate sensitivity to be used to capture venous thromboembolism safety outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here