z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Validity in Computer-Based Testing: a Literature Review of Comparability Issues and Examinee Perspectives
Author(s) -
Ika Kana Trisnawati
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
englisia journal of language education and humanities
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2527-6484
pISSN - 2339-2576
DOI - 10.22373/ej.v2i2.345
Subject(s) - comparability , popularity , equivalence (formal languages) , reliability (semiconductor) , test (biology) , computer science , order (exchange) , psychology , mathematics , reliability engineering , social psychology , economics , engineering , discrete mathematics , physics , combinatorics , thermodynamics , paleontology , power (physics) , finance , biology
These past years have seen the growing popularity of the Computer-Based Tests (CBTs) in various disciplines, for various purposes, although the Paper-and Pencil Based Tests (P&Ps) are still in use. However, many question on whether the use of CBTs outperform the effectiveness of the P&Ps or if the CBTs can become a valid measuring tool compared to the PBTs. This paper tries to present the comparison on both the CBTs and the P&Ps and their respective examinee perspectives in order to figure out if doubts should arise to the emergence of the CBTs over the classic P&Ps. Findings showed that the CBTs are advantageous in that they are both efficient (reducing testing time) and effective (maintaining the test reliability) over the P&P versions. Nevertheless, the CBTs still need to have their variables well-designed (e.g., study design, computer algorithm) in order for the scores to be comparable to those in the P&P tests since the score equivalence is one of the validity evidences needed in a CBT.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom