z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Twelve Chinese Zoosigns of Zodiak: Tradition and Modernity
Author(s) -
Vladimir N. Denisenko,
Yu Xu Zheng
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
vestnik rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. seriâ: teoriâ âzyka, semiotika, semantika/vestnik rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. seriâ teoriâ âzyka, semiotika, semantika
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2411-1236
pISSN - 2313-2299
DOI - 10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-4-1299-1313
Subject(s) - literature , metaphor , object (grammar) , meaning (existential) , worship , china , history , linguistics , philosophy , epistemology , art , theology , archaeology
The work is devoted to the origins and peculiarities of zodiac signs in the ancient Chinese tradition. The study is carried out within the frames of linguocultural approach towards interpreting animalistic metaphors, namely, the zoonyms of the twelve zodiac signs which in China, are used to characterize people concerning their date of birth and are passed on from generation to generation. Chinese zodiacs are based on the astronomic theory of constellations and human worship (idolatry) of totems. It focuses on the comparison of zoonym metaphors reflected as Chinese zodiac signs both in the Chinese and Russian languages proceeding from the theory of metaphor in modern cognitive aspect to detect similarities and differences, and as well, the study of cultural roots of zoonym metaphors revealed in the Chinese zodiac signs. The object of the study concerns zoonyms of zodiac signs possessing the relevant meaning in the Chinese zoological lexis. The work elaborates the definition of the notion zodiac, describes the processes of the genesis, formation and development of the Zodiac culture and its specific cultural relevance; according to the analysis undertaken, the means to differentiate twelve animals of the Chinese Zodiac, and those of Chinese fairy tales, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, in Russian - animals were discussed and verified as to I.A. Krylovs fables. The conclusion states that metaphors are determined by the language itself, and linguocultures of various nations are reflected in specific metaphors and other peculiarities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here