z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy
Author(s) -
Fernando Leal
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
informal logic
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 2293-734X
pISSN - 0824-2577
DOI - 10.22329/il.v41i2.6338
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , premise , ethos , epistemology , socratic method , philosophy , linguistics
Argumentation that uses the beliefs of one’s opponents to refute them is well known (ad hominem in the classical sense). This paper proposes that there is a hitherto unnoticed counterpart to it, to be called ab homine, in which speakers/writers argue through the manner in which they deliver a message. Since the manner of delivery can never be turned into a premise or premises, this form of argumentation—although somewhat resembling Aristotle’s ethos—is much closer to the peculiar force of Socratic elenchos.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here