Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement | Zendy

Diego Castro | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement

Author(s) -

Diego Castro

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

informal logic

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368

H-Index - 15

eISSN - 2293-734X

pISSN - 0824-2577

DOI - 10.22329/il.v41i2.5580

Subject(s) - argumentation theory , persuasion , deliberation , toolbox , dialogical self , negotiation , epistemology , computer science , psychology , social psychology , sociology , political science , philosophy , law , social science , politics , programming language

Some disagreements seem to be persistent: they are, pretty much, immune to persuasive argumentation. If that is the case, how can they be overcome? Can argumentation help us? I propose that to overcome persistent disagreements through argumentation, we need a dynamic and pluralistic version of argumentation. Therefore, I propose that argumentation, more than a tool that uses persuasion to change the mind of the counterpart, is a toolbox that contains persuasion, deliberation, negotiation, and other dialogical strategies that can be used to reach an agreement.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research