z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Where Do Sounds Fit Within Informal Logic?
Author(s) -
Leo Groarke
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
informal logic
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 2293-734X
pISSN - 0824-2577
DOI - 10.22329/il.v38i3.5325
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , sound (geography) , process (computing) , epistemology , psychology , cognitive science , linguistics , sociology , computer science , philosophy , acoustics , physics , operating system
In response to commentaries by Eckstein and Kišiček, I argue that the study of auditory arguments is very much in keeping with the critical thinking (and epistemological) ideals that motivate informal logic. In the process I support further research on sound figures and the meaning of sound (and a possible “auditory dictionary”) that would enhance our ability to analyze auditory arguments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here