z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How Philosophical is Informal Logic?
Author(s) -
John A. Woods
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
informal logic
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 2293-734X
pISSN - 0824-2577
DOI - 10.22329/il.v20i2.2266
Subject(s) - informal logic , philosophy of logic , epistemology , proposition , mainstream , sociology , philosophy , theology , argumentation theory
Consider the proposition, "Informal logic is a subdiscipline of philosophy". The best chance of showing this to be true is showing that informal logic is part of logic, which in turn is a part of philosophy. Part 1 is given over to the task of sorting out these connections. If successful, informal logic can indeed be seen as part of philosophy; but there is no question of an exclusive relationship. Part 2 is a critical appraisal of the suggestion that informal logic is applied epistemology. Part 3 examines the claim that informal logic has failed to penetrate into mainstream philosophy, and suggestions for amelioration are considered.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here