Open AccessUterovaginal Prolapse: The Sociodemographic profile and reproductive health service uptake in A Low Resource Setting, Calabar, Nigeria
Author(s) -
C.O. Njoku,
Amarachukwu Nnaemezie Njoku,
Efiok Eyo Efiok
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of contemporary medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2415-1629
pISSN - 2413-0516
DOI - 10.22317/jcms.v6i1.672
Subject(s) - medicine , sex organ , parity (physics) , obstetrics , reproductive health , southeastern nigeria , fertility , health facility , medical record , gynecology , marital status , health services , demography , population , environmental health , surgery , genetics , physics , particle physics , socioeconomics , sociology , biology
Objective: To determine the prevalence, sociodemographic profiles, utilization of reproductive health services and delay in seeking medical care of patient with uterovaginal prolapse in Calabar, Nigeria. Methods: This was a retrospective study of women who presented with uterovaginal prolapse at University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria between 1st May 2009 and 1st June 2019. Patients case records were retrieved and analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS Version 22. Results: The prevalence of genital prolapse was 0.3%. The mean age and parity were 60.19 ± 8.71 years and 6.31 ± 2.80, respectively. The mean duration of symptoms before presentation was 3.19 ± 2.16 years. Genital prolapse was commonest among age group 60-79 years (52.8%), parity 5-9 (66.7%), post-menopausal (97.2%), primary education (55.6%) and farmers (47.2%). Grade 3 uterovaginal prolapse was the commonest grade (58.3%). Most patients (86.1%) had symptoms of genital prolapse for less than 5 years before seeking medical treatment. The majority of patients had no antenatal care during their pregnancies (80.6%), no skilled attendant at deliveries (86.1%) and no contraceptive use during their reproductive years (77.8%). Participants with lower parity (1-4) (p=0.03), higher educational level (p˂ 0.001) and teachers/civil servants (p=0.043) presented earlier (less than 1 year) to the hospital. Conclusion: There is poor utilization of reproductive health services among women who develop uterovaginal prolapse in our environment. Women with higher social status sought for help earlier. Increasing awareness of this condition and providing antenatal care, skilled birth attendants and contraceptive services will reduce the burden of this condition.