z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Differentiation between the Regulatory paths placed on Mouthwashes in the US and EU
Author(s) -
Philip Saddik,
John Pappan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international journal of drug regulatory affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2321-7162
pISSN - 2321-6794
DOI - 10.22270/ijdra.v6i2.229
Subject(s) - cosmetics , confusion , food and drug administration , european union , medicine , dentistry , business , gingivitis , traditional medicine , psychology , environmental health , economic policy , pathology , psychoanalysis
Regulating oral rinses has been and still is a topic of debate and confusion. Oral rinses are products that are mainly used for cleaning, perfuming and changing the appearance of the teeth, which in turn improves the individual’s external appearance. Adding medicinal ingredients to these rinses, it can then be used for the elimination and/or prevention of some oral diseases, an example being gingivitis. The United States Food and Drug Administration placed guidelines which state that mouthwashes with possible therapeutic properties should be registered as drugs rather than cosmetics. Meanwhile, on a different continent, Germany along with the other members of the European Union decided not to categorize mouthwashes as drugs, but rather as cosmetics, using its sole purpose of cleaning and beautifying the teeth as the excuse. The following research will thoroughly differentiate between the diverse regulatory systems forced upon mouthwashes across the two countries—the United States and Germany.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here