z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Predictive Analytics and Child Welfare: Toward Data Justice
Author(s) -
Joanna Redden
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian journal of communication
Language(s) - French
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.343
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 1499-6642
pISSN - 0705-3657
DOI - 10.22230/cjc.2020v45n1a3479
Subject(s) - accountability , deliberation , analytics , welfare , predictive analytics , transparency (behavior) , intervention (counseling) , public economics , social welfare , economic justice , public relations , business , political science , economics , medicine , data science , computer science , nursing , law , politics
Background  Child welfare agencies in many countries are increasingly using predictive analytics to influence decisions about the allocations of resources and services, risk, and intervention.Analysis  The speed with which predictive analytics is being introduced in child welfare services is problematic. Research on this issue raises significant concerns about inequality, transparency, public accountability and oversight.Conclusion and implications  These systems are being introduced before adequate review and necessary public debate on whether they should be used in areas of social care. In order for such debate to occur, there needs to be: a) more information about where and how these systems are being implemented; b) greater effort to generate wider public deliberation about their use; and c) more investigation of their impact on practitioners and families.Contexte  Dans plusieurs pays, les agences de protection de l’enfance recourent de plus en plus à l’analyse prédictive afin d’influencer les décisions sur l’allocation des ressources et services, le risque et les interventions.Analyse  L’empressement avec lequel on a commencé à appliquer l’analyse prédictive aux services de protection de l’enfance pose un problème. En effet, la recherche sur ce sujet soulève des questions significatives sur l’inégalité, la transparence, l’obligation publique de rendre des comptes et la surveillance publique.Conclusion et implications  On a adopté cette approche avant de l’avoir examiné adéquatement ou d’avoir débattu publiquement de sa pertinence pour les services sociaux. Pour qu’un tel débat puisse avoir lieu, il faudrait : a) plus d’information sur où et comment instaurer cette approche; b) un plus grand effort pour encourager des délibérations publiques sur celle-ci; et c) une investigation plus approfondie de son impact sur les praticiens et les familles.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here