Open AccessCOMPARATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF NORMAL SALINE AND 10% POVIDONE IODINE IN PERIURETHRAL CLEANING
Author(s) -
Awaluddin Awaluddin
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
jurnal endurance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2477-6521
DOI - 10.22216/je.v1i1.380
Subject(s) - urinary system , medicine , saline , urology , incidence (geometry) , population , surgery , physics , environmental health , optics
Currently, urinary tract infection incidence in patients with indwelling urinary catheter ranges between 10-80%. They are at risk for other problems that can cause death. Appropriate action is required to decrease urinary tract infection risk by periurethral area cleaning. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences of the effectiveness of the use of normal saline and 10% povidone iodine for periurethral area cleaning in decreasing urinary tract infection risk. Research methods uses experimental design with the population of patients who used indwelling urinary catheter. Samples were obtained by consecutive and allocation by randomization which were divided into 2 groups, each group were 17 respondents. In the treatment group, periurethral area was cleaned with normal saline and in the control group with 10% povidone iodine. Urinary tract infection risk assessment was carried out by the leukocyte esterase dipstick test at 8 hours after insertion. The results indicate that the incidence of urinary tract infections risk in the group using normal saline smaller than 10% povidone iodine with a comparison of 1:1.3. Number need to treat in this study was 6. The conclusion of this study is normal saline is more effective in reducing urinary tract infection risk.