z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of Brick Wall, Shear Wall and Bare Frame on G+12 High Rise Building
Author(s) -
Ankur Verma
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal for research in applied science and engineering technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2321-9653
DOI - 10.22214/ijraset.2021.38660
Subject(s) - shear wall , structural engineering , shear (geology) , facade , geology , engineering , geotechnical engineering , petrology
Today, larger part of designs around us are built up concrete cement (RCC) outlined constructions. To forestall harm because of quake there is a need to foster powerful procedure to expand the strength and flexibility of elevated structures. Shear wall are steadier and more pliable and thus can bear more even loads. In this paper, we have proposed a relative report between block facade, shear divider and uncovered casing by using ETABS programming. This review is essentially centered around seismic conduct of G+12 building. The outcomes are talked about as far as base shear, sidelong relocation, story float, story solidness and normal period for every one of the three models. We find that shear wall has least parallel uprooting and least time span when contrasted and block facade and uncovered edge. Likewise, we track down that the shear divider model is more adaptable because of lesser float when contrasted and different models. The upsides of removal and float for shear wall is likewise not as much as block facade since the tallness of the structure increments. Keywords: shear wall, bare frame, Response spectrum, Earthquake, ETABS

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here