Open Access
Implementation of Sparse Techniques for MIMO Channel Estimation
Author(s) -
S. Ramith
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal for research in applied science and engineering technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2321-9653
DOI - 10.22214/ijraset.2021.35288
Subject(s) - compressed sensing , computer science , channel (broadcasting) , mimo , overhead (engineering) , algorithm , wireless , computational complexity theory , spectral efficiency , mean squared error , mathematics , telecommunications , statistics , operating system
Channel estimation plays a very important role on the performance of wireless communication systems.Channel estimation can be carried out in different ways: with or without the help of a parametric model, using frequency and/or time correlation properties in the wireless channel, blind methods or those based on training pilots, adaptive or non-adaptive methods. As more antennas are added to Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) system more computational resources and power are required. There is a need to address this problem of the overhead in training symbol based models for channel estimation. Compressed Sensing (CS) algorithms are beneficial in addressing these limitations in the system to increase the spectral efficiency can help free up resources and prevent additional taxing on the hardware. Compressed sensing the pilot symbols by using CS algorithms like OMP, SP, and CoSaMP algorithms. The channel coefficients are obtained through LS, MMSE and LMS techniques. Then, a very small amount of frequency-domain orthogonal pilots are used for the accurate channel estimation.The traditional algorithms like LS , MMSE and LMS combined with CS algorithms have better performance at low SNRs compared to conventional techniques alone in terms of computational time complexity and Normalised Mean Square Error(NMSE) performance. There is a halving of pilot symbols used for training by using the CS algorithm. MSE performance is increased with increase in sparsity level. CoSaMP performs better than SP and OMP at low SNRs. With increase in sparsity level after 50K, the performance of SP is comparable to that of CoSaMP. OMP is simple to implement but MSE performance is less and computational time is more compared to SP and CoSaMP.