z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The use of chelating agents with passive ultrasonic irrigation enhances root canal filling sealing ability
Author(s) -
Gisele Jung Franciscatto,
Giampiero RossiFedele,
Manuela Favarin Santini,
Mariana De Carlo Bello,
Minéia Weber Blattes,
Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
investigación clínica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2477-9393
DOI - 10.22209/ic.v62n2a04
Subject(s) - ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid , sodium hypochlorite , root canal , chemistry , smear layer , chelation , distilled water , citric acid , nuclear chemistry , chromatography , dentistry , biochemistry , inorganic chemistry , medicine , organic chemistry
The aim of this study was to compare the influence of a final rinse with and without passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or 10% citric acid (CA), with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) with PUI, on the sealing ability of root canal fillings. Root canal instrumentation was performed in single-rooted premolars using NaOCl as the irrigant. Subsequently, the roots were randomly allocated into four experimental groups (n=23): EDTA+PUI, EDTA, CA+PUI, CA and control group: NaOCl+PUI. The specimens were root-filled using gutta-percha with a resin-based sealer and inserted into a device to measure glucose leakage at 7 and 30 days. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann- Whitney tests were used to evaluate the differences between the solutions and with or without PUI. Friedman’s ANOVA was used to compare time points (P<0.05). PUI groups showed lower infiltration values (EDTA+PUI 0.74±0.77 and CA+PUI 5.32±1.45) when compared to the groups on which PUI was not performed (EDTA 7.20±2.18 and CA 20.73±4.70), this difference was significant for EDTA (P<0.01) and CA (P=0.000). Also, EDTA showed less glucose infiltration than CA, with or without PUI (P<0.005). NaOCl+PUI showed a higher cumulative glucose infiltration (22.92±9.71). A final rinse using EDTA or CA with PUI enhances the sealing of root canal fillings. EDTA showed less infiltration.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here