z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Benefit-risk trade-offs in treatment choice in advanced HER2 negative breast cancer: patient and oncologist perspectives
Author(s) -
Suvina Amin,
Sara M. Tolaney,
M. Janelle CambronMellott,
Kathleen Beusterien,
Martine C. Maculaitis,
Emily Mulvihill,
Reshma Shinde,
Kimmie McLaurin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
future oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.857
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1744-8301
pISSN - 1479-6694
DOI - 10.2217/fon-2021-0761
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , nausea , quality of life (healthcare) , cancer , physical therapy , oncology , intensive care medicine , nursing
Aim: To evaluate which treatment attributes US patients and oncologists prioritize in HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: Preferences were assessed via a discrete choice experiment. Also, treatment goal statements were rated on an agreement scale. Results: Patients (n = 169) most valued improving overall survival (OS), followed by improving nausea and neuropathy. Oncologists (n = 117) most valued improving OS, followed by neuropathy and progression-free survival. Regarding treatment goals, oncologists (67%) perceived that patients are more focused on efficacy than quality of life; fewer patients (29%) agreed with this statement; 81% of oncologists and 51% of patients agreed that patients prefer oral treatment. Conclusion: Patients and oncologists were willing to accept increases in toxicities in exchange for efficacy improvements in HER2 negative ABC.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here