Open AccessIntegrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with surgical oncology practice within national guideline and staging recommendations
Author(s) -
David M. Hyams,
Kyle R. Covington,
Clare Johnson,
Kristen M Plasseraud,
Robert W. Cook
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
future oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.857
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1744-8301
pISSN - 1479-6694
DOI - 10.2217/fon-2020-0827
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , melanoma , stage (stratigraphy) , oncology , pathology , cancer research , paleontology , biology
Aim: Define changes in clinical management resulting from the use of the prognostic 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test for cutaneous melanoma in a surgical oncology practice. Patients & methods: Management plans for 112 consecutively tested patients with stage I–III melanoma were evaluated for duration and number of clinical visits, blood work and imaging. Results: 31-GEP high-risk (class 2; n = 46) patients received increased management compared with low-risk (class 1; n = 66) patients. Test results were most closely associated with follow-up and imaging. Of class 1 patients, 65% received surveillance intensity within guidelines for stage I–IIA patients; 98% of class 2 patients received surveillance intensity equal to stage IIB–IV patients. Conclusion: We suggest clinical follow-up and metastatic screening be adjusted according to 31-GEP test results.