z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Indirect treatment comparison of valbenazine and deutetrabenazine efficacy and safety in tardive dyskinesia
Author(s) -
Saurabh Aggarwal,
Michael Serbin,
Charles Yonan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of comparative effectiveness research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.567
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 2042-6313
pISSN - 2042-6305
DOI - 10.2217/cer-2019-0059
Subject(s) - tardive dyskinesia , medicine , clinical global impression , clinical trial , alternative medicine , psychiatry , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , pathology , placebo
Aim: Utilize the Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) method to compare valbenazine and deutetrabenazine efficacy using clinical trial data. Methods: Outcomes included mean change from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) total score, AIMS response (≥50% improvement), clinical global impression of change response (score ≤2) and safety outcomes. Data were pooled by trial and dose; outcomes were analyzed at multiple time points. Results: ITC of AIMS score improvement significantly favored valbenazine 80 mg/day at 6 weeks versus deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day at 8 weeks, while valbenazine 40 mg/day was statistically similar to all doses of deutetrabenazine at all time points. No significant differences between drugs were found in AIMS and clinical global impression of change responses and safety outcomes. Conclusion: In this ITC of pooled trial data, valbenazine was generally favorable over deutetrabenazine, although dose titration and equivalency should be considered when interpreting results.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here