Potential Risks of A Widespread Use of 3D Printing for The Manufacturing of Face Masks During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic
Author(s) -
Sven Duda,
Sascha Hartig,
Karola Hagner,
Lisa Meyer,
Paula Wessling Intriago,
Tobias Meyer,
H. Wessling
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of 3d printing in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2059-4763
pISSN - 2059-4755
DOI - 10.2217/3dp-2020-0014
Subject(s) - face masks , covid-19 , pandemic , personal protective equipment , 3d printing , face (sociological concept) , respirator , presentation (obstetrics) , 3d printed , medicine , computer science , engineering , virology , mechanical engineering , materials science , biomedical engineering , surgery , pathology , sociology , social science , disease , outbreak , infectious disease (medical specialty) , composite material
Background: In 2020, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic caused serious concerns about the availability of face masks. This paper studies the technical feasibility of user-specific face mask production by 3D printing and the effectiveness of these masks. Material & methods: Six different face mask designs were produced by 3D printing and tested by subjective experimenter evaluation and using a respirator fit testing kit. Results were compared with the requirements as given for standard protective face masks. Results: None of the printed masks came anywhere near the required standards for personal protective gear. Conclusion: In spite of their euphoric presentation in the press, none of the currently advertised 3D printed mask designs are suitable as reliable personal protective equipment.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom