Open AccessЕще раз о формах показателя множественного числа в тюркских языках
Author(s) -
Анна Дыбо,
Lidia F. Abubakirova,
Oleg R. Hisamov,
Evgeniya V. Korovina,
Zarema K. Kochakaeva,
Alexandra V. Sheymovich
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
oriental studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.2
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 2619-1008
pISSN - 2619-0990
DOI - 10.22162/2619-0990-2020-51-5-1415-1437
Subject(s) - affix , kazakh , plural , linguistics , computer science , relevance (law) , history , alternation (linguistics) , field (mathematics) , natural language processing , mathematics , philosophy , pure mathematics , political science , law
. The article continues the discussion of isogloss types and their relevance for the Proto-Turkic reconstruction and reconstruction of the intermediate nodes of the Turkic family tree. Goals. The paper makes another attempt to reconstruct the morphophonological appearance of some affixes for intermediate languages-ancestors of the standard Turkic group (Oguz, ‘Kyrgyz’, Altai, Karluk, Toba, Kypchak). The study draws into consideration not only the plural affix *-lar, but in general inflectional and derivational affixes starting with *-l. Materials and Methods. Methods of stepwise reconstruction are used simultaneously with morphophonological methods of identifying classes of positions and distribution of classes of allomorphs. Field records of dialects, dialectological publications, both modern ones and those of the 19th century, as well as written monuments were used as research material. Results. Both modern field data and classical sources, with the correct application of the methods of stepwise reconstruction, point that affixal *-l has no alternants in proto-Oghuz, proto-Karluk and proto-Qypchaq. All instances of alternation in modern idioms like dialectal Bashkir, dialectal Kazakh, ‘Qyrghyz’ languages, Yakut-Dolghan and Toba languages are to be classified as recent areal innovation. This is deduced due to the nature of morphophonological rules in these languages — neither is applyable for the proto-Common-Turkic stem auslaut, but instead is limited to forms that are specific to each separate group in question.