z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
ANTIBACTERIAL EFFICACY OF NISIN AS AN IRRIGANT AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS BIOFILM
Author(s) -
Theresia Peggy Haryanti,
Kamizar Nazar,
Anggraini Margono
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of applied pharmaceutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.238
H-Index - 15
ISSN - 0975-7058
DOI - 10.22159/ijap.2019.v11s1.161
Subject(s) - enterococcus faecalis , nisin , sodium hypochlorite , biofilm , microbiology and biotechnology , chlorhexidine , chemistry , bacteria , agar , agar plate , cetrimide , antibacterial activity , food science , staphylococcus aureus , antimicrobial , biology , medicine , organic chemistry , dentistry , genetics
Objective: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of 10% nisin, 2% chlorhexidine (ChX), and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in vitro.Methods: Petri dishes containing brain heart infusion agar were seeded with E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) and were incubated overnight at 37°C. Thecellulose nitrate filter membrane was inoculated with E. faecalis for 72 h to grow a biofilm, and we performed the direct contact test between the testsolutions and the biofilm for 10 min. The DNA was quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction with propidium monoazide additive to countthe living cells.Results: The number of E. faecalis bacteria in the 2% ChX group was the lowest (8.36×103 CFU/mL) while the highest number of bacteria - among theantibacterial substances tested - in the nisin 10% group (5.55×106 CFU/mL).Conclusion: The antibacterial effects against E. faecalis biofilm of 10% nisin were not comparable with those of 2% ChX and 2.5% NaOCl.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here