Open AccessCovid-19 and Precarity in South Africa’s Minibus Taxi Industry
Author(s) -
Siyabulela Christopher Fobosi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
social science, humanities and sustainability research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2690-3636
pISSN - 2690-3628
DOI - 10.22158/sshsr.v2n3p1
Subject(s) - precarity , unemployment , business , covid-19 , profit (economics) , labour economics , economic growth , economics , market economy , medicine , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , microeconomics
This article considers covid-19 and precarity in South Africa’s minibus taxi industry. Covid-19 and the resulting national lockdown interrupted the operations of the industry (like other businesses) in South Africa. During the lockdown (from level 5 to level 1), some taxi operators complained that the lockdown resulted in them losing profit. Taxi drivers also complained that they are making less money through taxi fares (noting that each day they give collected fares to taxi owners and keep some of the money for petrol). The labour inspectors of the Department of Employment and Labour (DOEL) continue to find it difficult to exercise their role of inspecting working conditions in the industry. Despite the fact that the DOEL issued a Sectoral Determination for the taxi industry (Basic Condition of Employment Act 95 of 1997, Sectoral Determination 11: Taxi Sector 2005), which specifies basic employment conditions, the industry is still predominantly informal and employees have no job protection. Taxi drivers remain exempt from job-related benefits such as the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF), which makes it impossible for them to benefit during difficult times such as Covid-19 and unemployment. Therefore, the virus and the lockdown revealed further the precariousness of taxi drivers and the concerns around making profit by taxi owners.