z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does Binary Classification of Motivation Carry Weight (Note 1)
Author(s) -
Donghong Liu,
Shining Zhu
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
study in english language teaching
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2372-9740
pISSN - 2329-311X
DOI - 10.22158/selt.v4n2p253
Subject(s) - autonomy , psychology , self determination theory , predictive power , social psychology , intrinsic motivation , political science , philosophy , epistemology , law
With the population of postgraduates increasing in China, their academic study has attracted the attention of second language acquisition researchers. But the research into postgraduates’ motivation and autonomy is unfortunately scarce. This study explores the relationship between learning motivation and learner autonomy among English-major postgraduates based on the questionnaire administered to 117 participants. In view of the complicatedness of the postgraduates’ academic study, both intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivations were further divided into two types. The results show that: 1) four types of motivation differ significantly and the strongest is motivation for job; 2) although each type of motivation positively correlates with the perceived autonomy, yet only type of intrinsic motivation and one type of extrinsic motivation has predictive power for the perceived autonomy. It indicates that binary classification of motivation does not work well in predicting the postgraduates’ perceived autonomy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here