z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan
Author(s) -
Ryan Beaton
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
constitutional forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1927-4165
pISSN - 0847-3889
DOI - 10.21991/cf29371
Subject(s) - sovereignty , law , supreme court , legitimacy , political science , legitimation , de facto , crown (dentistry) , sociology , politics , medicine , dentistry
This paper offers a short story of Crown sovereignty at the Supreme Court Canada in order to shed light on questions the Court has raised about the legitimacy of Crown sovereignty over territory claimed by First Nations. In skeletal form, the story is simple. The Crown — first Imperial British and later Canadian federal and provincial — asserted sovereignty over what is now Canadian territory, and Canadian courts (and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council) accepted those assertions without question. Yet the Supreme Court of Canada has lately qualified Crown sovereignty in striking ways, perhaps most notably in speaking of “de facto Crown sovereignty” in reasons released in 2004.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here