z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Administrative Law, Judicial Deference, and the Charter
Author(s) -
Matthew Lewans
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
constitutional forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1927-4165
pISSN - 0847-3889
DOI - 10.21991/c96m35
Subject(s) - deference , doctrine , administrative law , law , judicial deference , charter , political science , judicial review , standard of review , judicial opinion
The doctrine of judicial deference has been a touchstone in Canadian administrative law for thirty-five years. Put simply, the doctrine recognizes that administrative officials have legitimate authority to interpret the law, which means that judicial review is warranted only if an administrative decision is demonstrably unfair or unreasonable. While the tide of deference has ebbed and flowed over this period, most administrative decisions these days are assessed according to a standard of reasonableness instead of correctness.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here