Open AccessHome-Based Spirometry Telemonitoring After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Acceptability and Usability
Author(s) -
Ajay Sheshadri,
Sukh Makhnoon,
Amin M. Alousi,
Lara Bashoura,
Rene Andrade Ruiz,
Christopher Jeffrey Miller,
Karen Stolar,
Muhammad H. Arain,
Laila Noor,
Amulya Balagani,
Akash Jain,
David Blanco,
A. Ortíz,
Michael Taylor,
Alex Stenzler,
Rohtesh S. Mehta,
Uday Popat,
Chitra Hosing,
David Ost,
Richard E. Champlin,
Burton F. Dickey,
Susan K. Peterson
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
jmir formative research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2561-326X
DOI - 10.2196/29393
Subject(s) - usability , life expectancy , medicine , spirometry , system usability scale , spirometer , gerontology , psychology , heuristic evaluation , population , computer science , exhaled nitric oxide , environmental health , human–computer interaction , asthma
Background Home-based spirometry (HS) allows for the early detection of lung complications in recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT). Although the usability and acceptability of HS are critical for adherence, patient-reported outcomes of HS use remain poorly understood in this setting. Objective The aim of this study is to design a longitudinal, mixed methods study to understand the usability and acceptability of HS among recipients of AHCT. Methods Study participants performed HS using a Bluetooth-capable spirometer that transmitted spirometry data to the study team in real time. In addition, participants completed usability questionnaires and in-depth interviews and reported their experiences with HS. Analysis of interview data was guided by the constructs of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. Results Recipients of AHCT found HS to be highly acceptable despite modest technological barriers. On average, participants believed that the HS was helpful in managing symptoms related to AHCT (scores ranging from 2.22 to 2.68 on a scale of 0-4) and for early detection of health-related problems (score range: 2.88-3.12). Participants viewed HS favorably and were generally supportive of continued use. No significant barriers to implementation were identified from the patient’s perspective. Age and gender were not associated with the patient perception of HS. Conclusions Study participants found HS acceptable and easy to use. Some modifiable technical barriers to performing HS were identified; however, wider implementation of pulmonary screening is feasible from the patient’s perspective.