Open AccessEcological Momentary Assessment of Depression in People With Advanced Dementia: Longitudinal Pilot Study
Author(s) -
Iulia Niculescu,
Hannah Quirt,
Twinkle Arora,
Terry K. Borsook,
Robin Green,
Brett Q. Ford,
Andrea Iaboni
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jmir aging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2561-7605
DOI - 10.2196/29021
Subject(s) - inter rater reliability , dementia , depression (economics) , mood , psychology , rating scale , longitudinal study , clinical dementia rating , predictive validity , reliability (semiconductor) , clinical psychology , construct validity , ecological validity , psychiatry , psychometrics , cognition , medicine , cognitive impairment , developmental psychology , power (physics) , physics , disease , pathology , quantum mechanics , economics , macroeconomics
Background Barriers to assessing depression in advanced dementia include the presence of informant and patient recall biases. Ecological momentary assessment provides an improved approach for mood assessment by collecting observations in intervals throughout the day, decreasing recall bias, and increasing ecological validity. Objective This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the modified 4-item Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia for Momentary Assessment (mCSDD4-MA) tool to assess depression in patients with advanced dementia. Methods A intensive longitudinal pilot study design was used. A total of 12 participants with advanced dementia were enrolled from an inpatient psychogeriatric unit. Participants were assessed using clinical depression assessments at admission and discharge. Research staff recorded observations four times a day for 6 weeks on phones with access to the mCSDD4-MA tool. Descriptive data related to feasibility were reported (ie, completion rates). Statistical models were used to examine the interrater reliability and construct and predictive validity of the data. Results Overall, 1923 observations were completed, representing 55.06% (1923/3496) of all rating opportunities with 2 raters and 66.01% (1923/2913) with at least one rater. Moderate interrater reliability was demonstrated for all items, except for lack of interest . Moderate correlations were observed between observers and patient-reported outcomes, where observers reported fewer symptoms relative to participants’ self-reports. Several items were associated with and able to predict depression. Conclusions The mCSDD4-MA tool was feasible to use, and most items in the tool showed moderate reliability and validity for assessing depression in dementia. Repeated and real-time depression assessment in advanced dementia holds promise for the identification of clinical depression and depressive symptoms.