z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Behavioral Health Professionals’ Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study
Author(s) -
Julia Ivanova,
Tianyu Tang,
Nassim Idouraine,
Anita C. Murcko,
Adela Grando,
Mary Jo Whitfield,
Christy Dye,
Darwyn Chern
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
jmir mental health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2368-7959
DOI - 10.2196/21208
Subject(s) - focus group , thematic analysis , health care , information sharing , qualitative research , exploratory research , mental health , medicine , descriptive statistics , nursing , psychology , applied psychology , psychiatry , business , computer science , marketing , world wide web , economics , economic growth , social science , statistics , mathematics , sociology , anthropology
Background Patient-controlled granular information sharing (PC-GIS) allows a patient to select specific health information “granules,” such as diagnoses and medications; choose with whom the information is shared; and decide how the information can be used. Previous studies suggest that health professionals have mixed or concerned opinions about the process and impact of PC-GIS for care and research. Further understanding of behavioral health professionals’ views on PC-GIS are needed for successful implementation and use of this technology. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in health professionals’ opinions on PC-GIS before and after a demonstrative case study. Methods Four focus groups were conducted at two integrated health care facilities: one serious mental illness facility and one general behavioral health facility. A total of 28 participants were given access to outcomes of a previous study where patients had control over medical record sharing. Participants were surveyed before and after focus groups on their views about PC-GIS. Thematic analysis of focus group output was paired with descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis of surveys. Results Behavioral health professionals showed a significant opinion shift toward concern after the focus group intervention, specifically on the topics of patient understanding (P=.001), authorized electronic health record access (P=.03), patient-professional relationship (P=.006), patient control acceptance (P<.001), and patient rights (P=.02). Qualitative methodology supported these results. The themes of professional considerations (2234/4025, 55.5% of codes) and necessity of health information (260/766, 33.9%) identified key aspects of PC-GIS concerns. Conclusions Behavioral health professionals agreed that a trusting patient-professional relationship is integral to the optimal implementation of PC-GIS, but were concerned about the potential negative impacts of PC-GIS on patient safety and quality of care.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here