z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients’ Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study
Author(s) -
Peter J. Schulz,
Annalisa Pessina,
Uwe Hartung,
Serena Petrocchi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of medical internet research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.446
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1439-4456
pISSN - 1438-8871
DOI - 10.2196/20457
Subject(s) - health literacy , health information national trends survey , psychology , applied psychology , literacy , ehealth , health belief model , mediation , health education , social psychology , medical education , health care , health information , medicine , public health , nursing , pedagogy , economics , economic growth , political science , law
Background Interpreting health information and acquiring health knowledge have become more important with the accumulation of scientific medical knowledge and ideals of patient autonomy. Health literacy and its tremendous success as a concept can be considered an admission that not all is well in the distribution of health knowledge. The internet makes health information much more easily accessible than ever, but it introduces its own problems, of which health disinformation is a major one. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether objective and subjective health literacy are independent concepts and to test which of the two was associated more strongly with accurate judgments of the quality of a medical website and with behavioral intentions beneficial to health. Methods A survey on depression and its treatments was conducted online (n=362). The Newest Vital Sign was employed to measure objective, performance-based health literacy, and the eHealth Literacy Scale was used to measure subjective, perception-based health literacy. Correlations, comparisons of means, linear and binary logistic regression, and mediation models were used to determine the associations. Results Objective and subjective health literacy were weakly associated with one another ( r =0.06, P =.24). High objective health literacy levels were associated with an inclination to behave in ways that are beneficial to one’s own or others’ health (Exp[B]=2.068, P =.004) and an ability to recognize low-quality online sources of health information (β=–.4698, P =.005). The recognition also improved participants’ choice of treatment (β=–.3345, P <.001). Objective health literacy helped people to recognize misinformation on health websites and improved their judgment on their treatment for depression. Conclusions Self-reported, perception-based health literacy should be treated as a separate concept from objective, performance-based health literacy. Only objective health literacy appears to have the potential to prevent people from becoming victims of health disinformation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom