Open AccessA Biofeedback App to Instruct Abdominal Breathing (Breathing-Mentor): Pilot Experiment
Author(s) -
Corinna A. Faust-Christmann,
Bertram Taetz,
Gregor Zolynski,
Tobias Zimmermann,
Gabriele Bleser
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jmir mhealth and uhealth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 50
ISSN - 2291-5222
DOI - 10.2196/13703
Subject(s) - biofeedback , breathing , diaphragmatic breathing , relaxation (psychology) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , audiology , medicine , psychology , computer science , anesthesia , alternative medicine , pathology
Background Deep and slow abdominal breathing is an important skill for the management of stress and pain. However, despite multiple proofs on the effectiveness of biofeedback, most breathing apps remain limited to pacing specific breathing patterns, without sensor feedback on the actual breathing behavior. Objective To fill this gap, an app named Breathing-Mentor was developed. This app combines effective visualization of the instruction with biofeedback on deep abdominal breathing, based on the mobile phone’s accelerometers. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate users’ feedback and breathing behavior during initial contact with the app. Methods To reveal the possible effects of biofeedback, two versions of the mobile app were developed. Both contained the same visual instruction, but only the full version included additional biofeedback. In total, 40 untrained participants were randomly assigned to one of the two versions of the app. They had to follow the app’s instructions as closely as possible for 5 min. Results The group with additional biofeedback showed an increased signal-to-noise ratio for instructed breathing frequency (0.1 Hz) compared with those using visual instruction without biofeedback ( F 1,37 =4.18; P <.048). During this initial contact with the full version, self-reported relaxation effectivity was, however, lower than the group using visual instruction without biofeedback ( t 37 =−2.36; P =.02), probably owing to increased cognitive workload to follow the instruction. Conclusions This study supports the feasibility and usefulness of incorporating biofeedback in the Breathing-Mentor app to train abdominal breathing. Immediate effects on relaxation levels should, however, not be expected for untrained users.