Premium
White‐Tailed Deer Antler Research: A Critique of Design and Analysis Methodology
Author(s) -
DEMARAIS STEPHEN,
STRICKLAND BRONSON K.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.2193/2009-112
Subject(s) - antler , odocoileus , predictability , confusion , maturity (psychological) , white (mutation) , statistics , biology , ecology , mathematics , psychology , developmental psychology , psychoanalysis , biochemistry , gene
Debate within the popular and technical literature regarding predictability of antler size at maturity based on 1.5‐year antler size in white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) has led to confusion and uncertainty within constituent groups. Koerth and Kroll (2008) provided measures of age‐related antler development using recaptures of known‐age males from 12 deer populations in southern Texas. Several design and analysis issues reduce the scope and validity of their conclusion that amount of growth in the first set of antlers was a poor predictor of antler growth at maturity. Although unstated, the statistical hypothesis they tested did not coincide with their specific conclusions. Using a simulation, we show that their methods were susceptible to measurement bias. Their results are applicable only to populations with similar culling and management programs. Additionally, we provide recommendations for future research projects that evaluate predictability of antler size at maturity based on antler size at younger ages.