Premium
EFFICACY OF BLACK BEAR SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING TO REDUCE CONIFER DAMAGE IN WESTERN WASHINGTON
Author(s) -
ZIEGLTRUM GEORG J.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the journal of wildlife management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-2817
pISSN - 0022-541X
DOI - 10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0470:eobbsf]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - ursus , transect , bark (sound) , peninsula , feeding behavior , geography , foraging , black spruce , ecology , biology , forestry , taiga , zoology , demography , population , sociology
While searching for food, 1 black bear ( Ursus americanus ) may girdle 60–70 coniferous trees in a day during the spring months in western Washington, USA. Tree‐bark peeling and subsequent foraging on sapwood can result in substantial economic losses for forest landowners. The supplemental feeding program, a nonlethal approach to minimize black bear damage by providing an alternative food source, was developed by the Washington Forest Protection Association (WFPA) in 1986. From 1998 to 2002, I studied the efficacy of this supplemental feeding program on the Olympic Peninsula. I selected 14 conifer stands of approximately 20 ha each for study. Mean pretreatment conifer damage on these sites in 1998 was 26% of trees. In March 1999, 1,000 trees were marked on 4 transects throughout each stand. Two feeding stations were installed on each of 7 randomly chosen stands in April of 1999, while no supplemental feed was supplied on the remaining 7 control stands. I found that bears damaged significantly more trees on control sites than on treatment sites ( P < 0.001). To validate initial results, I removed feeding stations from 2 of the 7 feeding sites in July 2000. Damage increased by a factor of nearly 7 on 1 feeding site over the next 2 years. I concluded that the supplemental bear feeding program constituted a viable, nonlethal damage control tool.